I reorganized the "conflicts" based on whether they were protracted campaigns or just individual battles. Over time we'll probably be able to build pages for all these conflicts and battles and more. What do you think of this layout?
imho the whole "miscellany" complex has to be split up into "normal" categories that have speaking names and are integrated into the sidebar somehow - if it stays like this, the default reader will almost never reach this sections, unless he is digging through the page - and that is a pity, because there is a lot of information in here. "miscellany" = "not clear" = will not be read often.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.
Comments (3)
D'rek said
at 5:16 am on Nov 5, 2008
I reorganized the "conflicts" based on whether they were protracted campaigns or just individual battles. Over time we'll probably be able to build pages for all these conflicts and battles and more. What do you think of this layout?
Imperial Historian said
at 9:13 am on Nov 6, 2008
Looks good to me
moeb1us said
at 12:22 pm on Aug 30, 2009
imho the whole "miscellany" complex has to be split up into "normal" categories that have speaking names and are integrated into the sidebar somehow - if it stays like this, the default reader will almost never reach this sections, unless he is digging through the page - and that is a pity, because there is a lot of information in here. "miscellany" = "not clear" = will not be read often.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.